Too reads do not mean a dialogue.
Mid-read(NFRY): (i.e. live footnoting)
Survival of the fittest verses(~) corporate species and arms races[!]
Battle of the Narratives? (Corporate offspring, peacocks and elk.)
(head or tails not treated equally, but...)[somewhat akin to gander or goose?]
[fundamental try-vergence]...(grain v ladder)[LOL read v regulations]
Survival of the Narratives?
4-3-16 to read:
The Atlantic: Obama Doctrine
4-4-16
Hedges/Hudson on Neo-Liberal Economics.
[related (b.s.): Spencer... demo/mice...DecomPart * Meantalizing]
*Moline's Platonics / Darwinian Physics
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Thursday, March 31, 2016
Saturday, March 26, 2016
TRY-ANGLE NATION
Disclosure: Just elected Hillary Clinton Delegate for my precinct.
It was a gut decision for a truce between my head and my heart, not that I can triangulate that.
Well... maybe it was gut-Clinton, head-Undecided, and heart-Sanders.
Trump and Clinton Match-up?
*"BS~FD/make me" (0)
"BS~Borg" (A., B. Culture War , C., D. Obama With Drama , E., F., G., H.)
(BS)=blog search (scroll over any hyper-links)
3-27-16
I had woken up to that thought after reading only part way through a Philosophy Now article last night. [The "Ugliest of Things"?]
** or are all dichotomies false?
*** the punch line
"You can't _ _ _ _ _ your way out of problems with the same parties that got you into them."
to paraphrase the Obama problem and the nature of our government. Here "parties" is used in general terms, but with due respect for the three branches of government and the GOP, let alone the spirit of progress or hope to Trump nature. I am talking about the first article on War, and the Bush campaign that was a bull in a pottery barn.(~) (Speaking of policemen, nation builders and break it)
(~)(<) Lessons of War , Cost of Course [(~)]
Cost of Course [!], Hail to the Troops! [!]
Owe what a muddle we web. i.e. these (F'n) need review.
3-31-16
Expletive not intended, Foot Notes is the italic intent.
Mean While... (M'w,huh,ha)
Medved(msnbc) (~) the last conservative president was H. W. Bush (i.e. don't count Neo-cons)
Kasich (msnbc) Trump puts the con in conservative. (^) Also speaks of policing and intelligence, I was waiting for nation building.
Kinder Gardener: Do I have buyers remorse?
Well, I haven't bought anything. And we aren't a pottery barn. (oops unsegue)^
(return) Is the caucus system broken? Not for Bernie. Is the primary better? Only for Hillary?
It was a gut decision for a truce between my head and my heart, not that I can triangulate that.
Well... maybe it was gut-Clinton, head-Undecided, and heart-Sanders.
With this in mind to be potentially sorted later:
Make It So[!]
Why Young People Are Right About Hillary ClintonTrump and Clinton Match-up?
*"BS~FD/make me" (0)
"BS~Borg" (A., B. Culture War , C., D. Obama With Drama , E., F., G., H.)
(BS)=blog search (scroll over any hyper-links)
3-27-16
War and Peace is a false dichotomy**.
That was my heading(sub-heading for this addition) before technical difficulties wiped it out.I had woken up to that thought after reading only part way through a Philosophy Now article last night. [The "Ugliest of Things"?]
** or are all dichotomies false?
*** the punch line
"You can't _ _ _ _ _ your way out of problems with the same parties that got you into them."
to paraphrase the Obama problem and the nature of our government. Here "parties" is used in general terms, but with due respect for the three branches of government and the GOP, let alone the spirit of progress or hope to Trump nature. I am talking about the first article on War, and the Bush campaign that was a bull in a pottery barn.(~) (Speaking of policemen, nation builders and break it)
(~)(<) Lessons of War , Cost of Course [(~)]
Cost of Course [!], Hail to the Troops! [!]
Owe what a muddle we web. i.e. these (F'n) need review.
3-31-16
Expletive not intended, Foot Notes is the italic intent.
Mean While... (M'w,huh,ha)
Medved(msnbc) (~) the last conservative president was H. W. Bush (i.e. don't count Neo-cons)
Kasich (msnbc) Trump puts the con in conservative. (^) Also speaks of policing and intelligence, I was waiting for nation building.
Kinder Gardener: Do I have buyers remorse?
Well, I haven't bought anything. And we aren't a pottery barn. (oops unsegue)^
(return) Is the caucus system broken? Not for Bernie. Is the primary better? Only for Hillary?
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
Friday, March 11, 2016
Sunday, March 06, 2016
Minimum Wage Resources
http://www.epi.org/publication/importance-study-design-minimum-wage-debate/
http://journalistsresource.org/studies/economics/inequality/the-effects-of-raising-the-minimum-wage
http://www.nber.org/papers/w12663.pdf?new_window=1
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/44995
http://americanactionforum.org/insights/what-the-weight-of-minimum-wage-research-shows
https://www.facebook.com/eddiegilchrist/posts/10208542946436436
https://www.facebook.com/raiseourwage/photos/a.1676792199227347.1073741828.1672542002985700/1681523792087521/?type=3&theater
http://evonomics.com/no-one-knows-why-trump-is-winning/
http://evonomics.com/economist-debunks-one-of-the-biggest-myths-about-governments/
http://evonomics.com/apes-make-irrational-economic-decisions-that-includes-you/
http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/what-wrecked-scotus-nominations-623482435586
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/rachel-maddow-breaks-down-how-badly-the-us-needs-a-full-supreme-court-going-into-the-election/
http://journalistsresource.org/studies/economics/inequality/the-effects-of-raising-the-minimum-wage
http://www.nber.org/papers/w12663.pdf?new_window=1
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/44995
http://americanactionforum.org/insights/what-the-weight-of-minimum-wage-research-shows
https://www.facebook.com/eddiegilchrist/posts/10208542946436436
https://www.facebook.com/raiseourwage/photos/a.1676792199227347.1073741828.1672542002985700/1681523792087521/?type=3&theater
http://evonomics.com/no-one-knows-why-trump-is-winning/
http://evonomics.com/economist-debunks-one-of-the-biggest-myths-about-governments/
http://evonomics.com/apes-make-irrational-economic-decisions-that-includes-you/
http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/what-wrecked-scotus-nominations-623482435586
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/rachel-maddow-breaks-down-how-badly-the-us-needs-a-full-supreme-court-going-into-the-election/
Wednesday, March 02, 2016
Heidegger
Runes
Dagobert
Speaking of input, some have dissolved.
(TryUnism and* Punderous Pondering.)
*not exactly the link
(diaspora ofor the state)
[tan gents] Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Nietzsche , enatiodromia, Many Key an.
[~]
[!]
x, y, z
Dagobert
Speaking of input, some have dissolved.
(TryUnism and* Punderous Pondering.)
*not exactly the link
(diaspora ofor the state)
[tan gents] Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Nietzsche , enatiodromia, Many Key an.
[~]
[!]
x, y, z
Monday, February 29, 2016
Monday, February 22, 2016
NFRY MISC
RSN: From Scalia to Obama, What Rule of Law?
Salon: Hillary's about...
Salon: Krugman wonks?
Salon: Scalia brilliance
Slate: Judicial Appointment
Slate: A Liberal Scalia?
1., 2., 3. , 4. 5. 6. 7.
8.., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15.
Salon: Hillary's about...
Salon: Krugman wonks?
Salon: Scalia brilliance
Slate: Judicial Appointment
Slate: A Liberal Scalia?
1., 2., 3. , 4. 5. 6. 7.
8.., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15.
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
Punderous Pondering
(b.s. 1) A. Punderous Ponderings, Jack Tapper / President Obama, State of Politics, D. A Revolution?, Un-Exceptionalism, (fn)12-2012
(b.s. 2) A. What the Beck?, B. hmmm?, Too Random...,
(b.s. 2) A. What the Beck?, B. hmmm?, Too Random...,
Monday, February 15, 2016
Tetrahedron of Will.
Geometrics of Politics
With one euphemism tied behind my metaphors...the physics of pull.
{Tangent shall file ... }
With one euphemism tied behind my metaphors...the physics of pull.
{Tangent shall file ... }
Monday, January 25, 2016
"Juridical Positivism"
Bookmarks in Progress.
(b.s.) American Exceptionalism
(b.s.) Hegel Popper
** ~ (*) obviously not the only problem
The problem with science is labelism, perspectivism and humanity*.
...or generalizations and definitions.
( New Meta Theory ) ~Mobius asterisk*
Meanwhile.
[Antipodes of Narrative]
...(the muse escapes)***
[Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander]^
*** (apotheosize and anthropomorphize)
[Hegel’s philosophy is open to many objections, but to confound it with totalitarianism means to misunderstand it. Ernst Cassirer puts the matter very clearly in The Myth of the State (1946), a book dealing with much the same material as Popper’s, but in a much more scholarly manner. His Hegel chapter ends: “Hegel could extol and glorify the state, he could even apotheosize it. There is, however, a clear and unmistakable difference between his idealization of the power of the state and that sort of idolization that is the characteristic of our modern totalitarian systems.”]
^tetrahedron of history or teachers
[[Lacanian Leap?]]
(b.s.) American Exceptionalism
(b.s.) Hegel Popper
** ~ (*) obviously not the only problem
The problem with science is labelism, perspectivism and humanity*.
...or generalizations and definitions.
( New Meta Theory ) ~Mobius asterisk*
Meanwhile.
[Antipodes of Narrative]
...(the muse escapes)***
[Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander]^
*** (apotheosize and anthropomorphize)
[Hegel’s philosophy is open to many objections, but to confound it with totalitarianism means to misunderstand it. Ernst Cassirer puts the matter very clearly in The Myth of the State (1946), a book dealing with much the same material as Popper’s, but in a much more scholarly manner. His Hegel chapter ends: “Hegel could extol and glorify the state, he could even apotheosize it. There is, however, a clear and unmistakable difference between his idealization of the power of the state and that sort of idolization that is the characteristic of our modern totalitarian systems.”]
^tetrahedron of history or teachers
[[Lacanian Leap?]]
Labels:
blog search,
Footnotes,
Hegel,
NFRY,
Popper,
Walter Kaufmann
Sunday, January 24, 2016
Politics is (~)football by other means.
Sports is a fertile field for narrative. Just look at this weekend; the Brady/Manning matchup in the AFC and the Palmer/Newton NFC match up. Will it be age before Heisman?
Speaking of Clause Wits[!] *
* not fully read (or viewed football)yet
of / or
Clause Wits (3.0)?
\
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?
[Hume or ...(~)]
(~) "the continuation"
"War is the continuation** of politics by other means."
** Relative Exceptionalism
Speaking of Clause Wits[!] *
* not fully read (or viewed football)yet
of / or
Clause Wits (3.0)?
\
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?
[Hume or ...(~)]
(~) "the continuation"
"War is the continuation** of politics by other means."
** Relative Exceptionalism
Thursday, January 21, 2016
Below the Fold[!]
What if?
To pun on lede or ship we are on [!]*
C-labels or Art Young.
Ctrl F perspectivism, dimentionalism, Al Gore Rhythms.
(PR: preemptive reads?)
"due the math"
*spoiler alert[last 4 inserts]
Literally...
{Kruger Leap? Inversal Pictures[!]}1-23-16
To pun on lede or ship we are on [!]*
C-labels or Art Young.
Ctrl F perspectivism, dimentionalism, Al Gore Rhythms.
(PR: preemptive reads?)
"due the math"
*spoiler alert[last 4 inserts]
Literally...
{Kruger Leap? Inversal Pictures[!]}1-23-16
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Farewell to Knees[!]
I Ron Knees?
Church
State
Community
Individual ~
World
[Rough Tan~gent.]
Only the [inserts] are belated.(1/19/16)
Church
State
Community
Individual ~
World
[Rough Tan~gent.]
Only the [inserts] are belated.(1/19/16)
Saturday, January 09, 2016
New Meta Theory
The anthropomorphism of systems.**
Have your ad hominem and eat it too.
[The Digger You Deep?]*
*NFRY
**The personalization of math, geometry and logic.
[** + * = Quantum Sovereignty ]
Is it possible this is the nexus of Science and Theology?
Is it Schroedingers' coin of epistemology?
Is this support for the small "t", large "T": truth of Nietzsche?
[[ footnotes to reading*: "dangers in overemphasizing(...~...)"perplexed by the relation"{subject/object/rules}(5.)]]
Now that may be the ticket!!! Knot?^ The faith ~ science nexus.
{{Rough ramble: 3 dimensions are? 4this? 5th other!
Perpendicular perspective: x,y,z, space~time/point~sphere }}
{{{The result is in the balance.}}}
^/*
Have your ad hominem and eat it too.
[The Digger You Deep?]*
*NFRY
**The personalization of math, geometry and logic.
[** + * = Quantum Sovereignty ]
Is it possible this is the nexus of Science and Theology?
Is it Schroedingers' coin of epistemology?
Is this support for the small "t", large "T": truth of Nietzsche?
[[ footnotes to reading*: "dangers in overemphasizing(...~...)"perplexed by the relation"{subject/object/rules}(5.)]]
Now that may be the ticket!!! Knot?^ The faith ~ science nexus.
{{Rough ramble: 3 dimensions are? 4this? 5th other!
Perpendicular perspective: x,y,z, space~time/point~sphere }}
{{{The result is in the balance.}}}
^/*
Saturday, January 02, 2016
All Blank are not created equally.
Under 4eh[!]
OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal". Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything.
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.
Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy.
https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html
http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*
http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/
*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.
[ http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]
An Inconvenient Truth ?
Or unweaving of a quilt?
[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism.
OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal". Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything.
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.
Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy.
https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html
http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*
http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/
*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.
[ http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]
An Inconvenient Truth ?
Or unweaving of a quilt?
[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism.
Friday, January 01, 2016
FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2016 (page 1)
De~men~shun~alism[!]
Bohemian gravity!
Bohemian~INET*, Quid Pro Physics , A universe of 4 di-men shuns[!] ,Father, Son, , Meta4 V 4D, Chez V (slash) 4D , Wittgenstein ,
Gravitas~ Satire is not a two way street., 4Mat , Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One) , Way, Too Point Oh? , Or ask for a third , Funneling Crisis?
* compactified?
The catch may be in the fold. The pun is in the journalism. The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics. The point is: what is a dimension? Not to mention: what is a point? A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective. A point has no dimension. Two points represent 1 dimension or a line. Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions. Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space. But dimensions are one level below the point.
Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension. But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).
1-23-16 Overton Perspectivism {perspectivalism: x, y, z}
Bohemian gravity!
Bohemian~INET*, Quid Pro Physics , A universe of 4 di-men shuns[!] ,Father, Son, , Meta4 V 4D, Chez V (slash) 4D , Wittgenstein ,
Gravitas~ Satire is not a two way street., 4Mat , Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One) , Way, Too Point Oh? , Or ask for a third , Funneling Crisis?
* compactified?
The catch may be in the fold. The pun is in the journalism. The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics. The point is: what is a dimension? Not to mention: what is a point? A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective. A point has no dimension. Two points represent 1 dimension or a line. Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions. Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space. But dimensions are one level below the point.
Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension. But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).
1-23-16 Overton Perspectivism {perspectivalism: x, y, z}
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)